Wallace has always looked good to me. Hasselback has always looked solid, and poised, but never “exceptional” to me. So with that said, Wallace may very well be the better choice. I wouldn’t give that role to him yet, but with a couple of weeks of struggles for Hasselback, I might say, just give Wallace his chance. Although, your division, quite frankly, sucks, so just staying a bit ahead, is good enough. (my god, San Fransisco looks awful!)
For your running game to succeed, I would most definately say, go with the two back system. Both backs are not probowler calaber, and to stick with just one, will make life a lot easier on the opposing defenses.

Like the two back, I think it gives alot of versatility especially with some recievers down I’d look for Julius to get alot of balls thron his way early in the season.

Lee does two, good RB’s equal one great one? I think these two are capable of one combined pro bowl calibre year and really that’s all that matters.

As for Wallace, he has matured so much in the last two years he was so impatient before and looked to his athleticism to make plays, now he waits for things to develop hits check downs and you only see the athleticism by design or on broken plays.

I hate to use such a cliche but I believe Seneca Wallace offers an X factor that Hasselback does not.

For your running game to succeed, I would most definately say, go with the two back system. Both backs are not probowler calaber, and to stick with just one, will make life a lot easier on the opposing defenses.

I really hope Carlson progresses nicely for you guys in Seattle, he has good hands and his reach was an advantage at ND.