NCAA football fans, myself included, are pathetic. PATHETIC.How else can you possibly explain why we blindly accept this outdated, brutal method of selecting a national champion? We chirp to no end when decisions, like the one rendered earlier this week to keep the BCS’s status quo, come down from the conferences’ big whigs, yet we still support our teams to no end. In the meantime, those who run the BCS are laughing their way to the bank, knowing full well that their outdated method will continue to generate a ridiculous amount of revenue. It’s like Notre Dame’s Kevin White said, “If it isn’t broke, don’t fix it.”Despite the fact that every college football fan or critic I’ve ever met has unanimously agreed that the system is broke, college football’s ratings will not suffer this season. Personally, I’ve been talking about the Ohio State-USC showdown on week two that can easily end national title hopes for both big time programs long before the words bowl selection even come into play.
Now don’t get me wrong – with that much on the line, this one will likely be an awesome game and I will be jumping for joy when the Trojans annihilate the Buckeyes. But wouldn’t it be that much better if a game like that was part of a single elimination playoff structure? Isn’t it our duty as fans to send a message to those who continue to corrupt the integrity of how the sport’s annual champion (or in some cases co-champions) is selected? Is a boycott what we need?
Since that last suggestion isn’t realistic, I was hoping I can use this forum as a starting point for a “we want a playoff” petition that can be circulated across college football’s fan land. I need your help though. I’m not web savvy enough to build a flashy website, nor do I have the resources to get the word out, so if anyone can offer their time to support this cause, please email me and help me get this going.
In the meantime, here is my proposal for how this playoff should be structured:
1. Each team playing in BCS conferences plays nine in-conference regular season games and three out of conference games. The difference is, those three out of conference games MUST be against opponents from the BCS conferences. This will prevent any team’s record from being inflated and will produce a more reliable tie-breaking procedure for the playoff bracket.
2. Each conference will have a championship game. This means that the conferences that currently don’t have championships games, will have to re-align to two divisions. Notre Dame will also join the Big East (none of this independent garbage).
Pac 10 Big 10 Big East
North Division East Division North Division
Washington Penn State Connecticut
Washington State Ohio State Cincinnati
Oregon Michigan Louisville
Oregon State Michigan State Syracuse
California Illinois
Northwestern
South Division West Division South Division
Stanford Indiana West Virginia
USC Purdue South Florida
UCLA Wisconsin Rutgers
Arizona Iowa Pittsburgh
Arizona State Minnesota Notre Dame
3. The six conference champions receive automatic bids to the playoff. Two at-large teams are then selected as the seven and eight seeds. Mid major champions receive automatic selections, if they go undefeated in their regular seasons and finish in the top 10 in the final BCS rankings. If there are remaining slots, the at-large bid goes to the second place finisher with: a) the best record, b) if there are ties, head-to-head meetings, c) if they never played each other, the best out of conference record, d) if they have the same out of conference record, the best in-conference record, e) if they have the same in-conference record, the best point differential, f) if they have the same point differential, they flip a coin.
4. The current playoff would require seven games. The Cotton Bowl, the Chick Fil-A Bowl and the Capital One Bowl would join the Orange, Sugar, Rose and Fiesta Bowls as playoff games, with each bowl receiving its opportunity to host the championship game, once every seven years. The playoffs would run on Saturdays in December and January.
5. The seeding for the conference champions will be based on the same format as deciding the two at-large teams. Like the NFL and NHL, the teams will re-seed after each round, giving the top seed the decided advantage going forward.
And that’s how it should be done! Let’s get the word out. Let’s do it now.
DC
Email: ninersbuzz@yahoo.com
Like this post? Share it »Last post (s) by Dave C
- U.S.A. - Union of Stupid Americans - November 18th, 2008
- Pros and Cons of Iowa's Win - November 10th, 2008
- My November BCS Matchups - November 3rd, 2008
- This Is What Baseball is REALLY About - October 29th, 2008
- Farewell STB (at least a partial farewell) - October 27th, 2008






4 Responses to “Revamping College Football”
Posted: 05/02/08 at 8:14 am
dave my first article on this site was about college football needing a playoff system……….you have my vote.
here it is.
http://sportstalkbuzz.com/2007/12/17/ncaa-should-consider-playoff-system/#comments
Posted: 05/02/08 at 11:04 am
Are you in favour of the playoff format or would you do something different?
Posted: 05/02/08 at 11:51 am
in favor of it………i think it is needed but the bowls create so much money for the teams and conferences i can’t see it happening.
Posted: 05/03/08 at 5:13 am
Totally in favour of it! Great stuff both you and James! A CFB playoff format would rival the SuperBowl, it would be that great!