No big surprise here, but it appears we will have to live with the current BCS model to select college football’s national champion until at least 2012.
BCS officials have rejected the “plus-one” model, which was designed to form a four-team “playoff” type system in 2010. The plan was proposed by SEC and ACC officials, but the granddaddies of the Big 10 and Pac 10 said thanks, but no thanks.
I’m not sure if I like this decision that the beasts of the BCS handed down. Although I’m a Pac 10 fan, I’m sure Big 10 fans can agree that our favorite conferences’ tie-in with the Rose Bowl is outdated and needs to be eliminated. The Rose Bowl is no longer a more important or significant game than the Orange Bowl, the Sugar Bowl or the Fiesta Bowl and shouldn’t be used as an excuse to not let college football’s post season evolve. Let’s be honest - a USC/Georgia Rose Bowl would have been a heck of a game, but the “Granddaddy of them all” insisted on a traditional Big 10/Pac 10 matchup and the Trojans won a lopsided, stinker of a game against Illinois. Georgia, meanwhile, was pitted against Hawaii and brought the overrated Warriors back to earth.
To be fair, however, I don’t think the plus-one solution that the ACC and SEC proposed is a good idea. To me, it’s nothing more than another quick fix, as the 5th ranked team could have a legitimate claim to enter the dance and we’ll continue to argue over this for years to come. College football needs a real playoff, not a “plus-one” playoff and had the BCS organizers rejected this idea because it was a bad idea, then I would be fine with their decision.
Unfortunately, today’s ruling was only rendered because the “Granddaddy” conferences continue to live in the past. They would rather have their stupid tie-in to Pasadena then let college football fans enjoy what could be the most exciting post-season in North America.
I guess the dinosaurs will have to die off until progress is actually made on this front.
DC
E-mail: ninersbuzz@yahoo.com











